|
Martin-Marietta Facility - Denver, Colorado
SSP&A
developed a linked groundwater and surface water flow model for the
shallow alluvial aquifer, the Pierre Shale and other dipping bedrock
units to evaluate the fate and transport of VOCs, metals, and other
contaminants from onsite manufacturing areas to the downgradient river
alluvium and the South Platte River. SSP&A
used the model to evaluate the risk to Denver municipal wells located in
the river alluvium and to evaluate the effectiveness of existing interim
groundwater interception measures. SSP&A
also performed modeling and fate and transport evaluations to evaluate
alternate groundwater remedial measures and determine optimal well
locations in alluvial channels for expediting the clean-up. SSP&A
provided these technical services to complement engineering services
provided by another consultant retained by the facility in the conduct
of the RI/FS.
Micro Motion, Inc.
- Boulder, Colorado
SSP&A
conducted an investigation of a VOC plume in groundwater beneath a
manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado, to ascertain whether the
source was at that facility or a neighboring facility which conducts
similar manufacturing activities. Investigations included design and
implementation of hydrogeologic field work, including drilling, sampling
and hydraulic testing. Data analysis indicated that the plume originated
on the adjacent property.
SSP&A
designed a groundwater flow model and conducted capture zone analysis to
evaluate proposed extraction well and trench scenarios. In addition, SSP&A
provided litigation support in an associated cost recovery action. SSP&A
continues to provide oversight of a groundwater extraction remedy being
implemented by the neighboring facility.
PDF
Figure
Hytek Extraction
Well System - Kent, Washington
SSP&A
was retained to review a planned extraction well system at a
manufacturing facility in Kent, Washington, regulated under a RCRA Post
Closure Permit. Groundwater contamination consisted primarily of TCE,
1,2- DCE, and vinyl chloride, ranging from very high concentrations,
indicative of DNAPL, near the disposal area, to relatively low
concentrations at the site boundary. The planned extraction system
consisted of two well groups, one group near the source area, and
another group along the site boundary.
Following an evaluation of hydrogeologic conditions at the site,
including 2-D and 3-D modeling analyses, SSP&A
determined that the planned system was inadequate to capture the plume,
and that pumping rates six times greater than those originally planned
would be necessary. SSP&A
designed an alternate recovery well system and prepared a work plan for
the installation and testing of the expanded recovery well system. SSP&A
supervised the installation of five extraction wells and six monitor
wells at the site, and performed and analyzed five aquifer tests.
Following a two-week pilot pumping period, SSP&A
fine-tuned site hydrologic models using the pilot operational data and
determined the required operational pumping rates for the extraction
well system. SSP&A
participated in negotiations with the EPA and State of Washington
Department of Ecology to gain final approval of the system and approval
of a performance evaluation plan for demonstrating capture during system
operation. Since extraction system start-up in 1992, SSP&A
has conducted annual evaluations of the adequacy of capture and remedial
progress.
PDF
Figure
ReSolve Superfund
Site - North Dartmouth, Massachusetts
SSP&A
prepared the Preliminary Design for an extraction well system at the
ReSolve Superfund Site to contain and restore, where practical,
groundwater contaminated with PCE and other volatile organic compounds.
Work included an assessment of geochemical and hydrogeologic data to
identify the potential extent of DNAPL and dissolved phase contaminants;
analyses of aquifer tests; development and calibration of a 3-D
numerical groundwater flow and particle tracking model; modeling
analyses of alternate extraction well scenarios; and design of an
extraction well system considering performance objectives, wetland
issues and risk of DNAPL re-mobilization. SSP&A served on an Expert
Committee assembled to provide state-of-the-art advice on DNAPL issues.
PDF
Figure
Heleva Landfill
Superfund Site - Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania
SSP&A
performed site characterization and remedial design at this Superfund
site to address VOCs in groundwater extending from the landfill to
downgradient residential areas. Primary goals at the site have been
conducting hydrogeologic and hydrochemical investigations to
characterize groundwater flow and water quality conditions; evaluating
the extent of DNAPL contamination; and developing a conceptual design
for groundwater containment and restoration. Specific activities have
included monitoring, hydraulic testing, geochemical investigations,
groundwater flow modeling, capture zone analysis, fate and transport
modeling, and DNAPL assessments as part of the Remedial Design for the
site under an Administrative Order. SSP&A
has provided technical analysis in support of insurance litigation and
in support of negotiations related to the issuance of a ROD Amendment
and the Administrative Order.
PDF
Figure
Intersil Facility
- Sunnyvale, California
SSP&A
conducted numerical flow modeling and contaminant transport modeling at
the former Intersil facility in Sunnyvale, California. The facility is
underlain by a shallow plume of multiple contaminants, including PCE,
TCE, and 1,2-DCE. The plume, which has multiple sources, is believed to
have originated in part through spreading from a pool of DNAPLs located
beneath a leaking underground pipeline. SSP&A
used the results of the groundwater and transport modeling to evaluate
the effectiveness of several alternative configurations for the
pump-and-treat extraction system for groundwater remediation. The design
of the system was optimized under a number of constraints, including
total clean-up time and cost. SSP&A
also evaluated the currently-operating extraction system and devised a
cost-allocation scheme between Intersil and adjacent facilities.
Kodak Park West -
Rochester, New York
SSP&A
developed and calibrated a three-dimensional groundwater flow model for
Kodak Park West, a section of the Kodak Park industrial complex, and
used it to estimate directions and rates of groundwater flow and to
evaluate remedial options. The site is an extensive industrial facility
used for film manufacturing and processing and is currently under
regulation as a RCRA facility. The model utilizes a finite-difference
mesh of five layers and represents flow in a sequence of hydrogeologic
units underlying the site. Using the model, SSP&A
developed a detailed groundwater budget for Kodak Park West, determined
the existing pattern of groundwater flow in each hydrogeologic unit, and
tested proposed remedial measures. The model-development process and the
results of hydrogeologic calculations made with the model were
summarized in a detailed project report.
Chem-Dyne
Superfund Site - Hamilton, Ohio
The Chem-Dyne Superfund Site was operated as a hazardous waste treatment
plant until closure by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Spills and dumping of chemicals on
the surface of the sand-gravel aquifer had created a plume of
contaminated groundwater extending over 40 acres. The remedial plan
called for pumping and treating the contaminated water and injecting a
portion of the treated water to increase flushing in the aquifer. SSP&A
designed and supervised the construction of 25 monitoring wells, 36
piezometers, 18 shallow extraction wells, 7 intermediate extraction
wells and 8 injection wells. The system began operating in February
1987, and through 1992 an average of nearly one million gallons per day
were pumped and treated, with over one-third of the treated water
re-injected. The balance of the treatment water was discharged to the
Ford Hydraulic Canal, which flows into the Great Miami River.
In October 1992, a chemical assessment conducted by SSP&A
showed that the plume had been sufficiently diluted to the point that
water from the treatment plant could be discharged directly to surface
water, without the need for injection. The injection wells were shut
down at this time. The contaminant load from the treated water currently
meets the applicable NPDES limits and is discharged into the Ford
Hydraulic Canal.
SSP&A
continues to monitor withdrawal rates, well performance, water-level
responses and quality changes and prepares an annual report on
water-level and water-quality changes. SSP&A
also recommends and supervises redevelopment of extraction wells
affected by the growth of iron bacteria and advises on the amount and
distribution of withdrawals from the extraction wells.
PDF
Figure |